Thank You

Posted by Maggie Tamburro on 2012/05/29 7 Responses »
May 292012

Caveat emptor: This week’s BullsEye post differs greatly from our usual legal discourse.

Rather than debating the flashiest legal headline or latest judicial opinion, we wanted to share some hot-off-the-press news Continue reading »

May 222012

Act One: Picture the Scene

Your client is named as a defendant, together with a host of other companies, in a patent action filed in federal district court. You find yourself defending the action with unrelated companies – companies with whom your client has nothing in common but for the patents at issue. To make matters worse, the co-defendants are some of your client’s most formidable competitors, further complicating defense strategy and discovery issues. Continue reading »

Can a trademark counterfeiting and infringement plaintiff elect statutory damages instead of actual damages under the Lanham Act and still receive attorney’s fees? Continue reading »

The Supreme Court has issued a new patent law opinion that could signal a greater need for expert testimony in patent-related civil actions in federal district courts. Continue reading »

May 012012

One can hardly check the daily news feed from their favorite syndicators without encountering yet another high profile intellectual property headline. Whether it’s a breaking story about the NFL cracking down on counterfeiters, or the April 18th U.S. Supreme Court ruling regarding a dissatisfied patent applicant’s ability to introduce new evidence, intellectual property related lawsuits dominate headlines.

We decided to count down our top 4 most intriguing and attention-grabbing intellectual property cases thus far in 2012. Continue reading »

© 2011 BullsEye All Rights Reserved Published by IMS ExpertServices