| Home | | | Expert Login | | | Blog | | | FAQs | | | Newsletter | | | Contact Us |
By Dawn Corrigan
BullsEye Newsletter: March 2009
When hurricane insurance claims require mediation or litigation,
parties turn to meteorologists and structural engineers to perform
forensic meteorology and weather reconstruction and opine on wind
loads and wind damage, storm surge, and other weather conditions
at the precise time and location when damage occurred.
To learn more
about weather
reconstruction and hurricane litigation, I spoke with
expert meteorologist Dave Nolan.
Q. Before we talk about hurricane insurance litigation, tell
us a little about yourself.
A. I’m an Associate Professor of Meteorology at the University
of Miami. Most of my current research focuses on hurricane formation
and intensification. Also on the boundary layer—the part of
the hurricane that interacts with the ocean or the land—and
on hurricanes and climate change. Previously I’ve worked on
tornadoes and tropical meteorology. My Ph.D. work was on fluid dynamics.
Q.
What lessons can be learned from the uptick in Atlantic hurricane
and tropical storm activity during the past decade?
A. One
lesson people are learning is that if hurricane seasons stay as
active as they’ve been, every community along the gulf coast
will be hit eventually. Some have already been annihilated.
We always
knew there was a certain distance back from the water we had to
go to build safely. Our view of what that distance is will have
to change. For example, in Pensacola, 30 yards from the beach,
things will still be blown away.
Q. Tell us a little about your
forensic methods.
A. For cases on which I’ve worked as a meteorological expert
on matters involving hurricane damages, where I had to report on
details such as wind speed occurring at a particular moment and a
particular height, I’ve had to do a lot of original research.
On questions such as what was the peak gust, what was the sustained
wind, etc., you can’t just look the answers up in a table.
For such matters I have to go into the literature and figure out
the answer. And my impression is that not everyone who’s working
on these cases is doing so. I’ve seen expert reports from other
experts where this work hadn’t been done. But I believe that
was simply because they didn’t have the training necessary
to perform the research and arrive at more accurate results.
Q.
How can this be the case?
The science isn’t there. If you ask, “In the eyewall,
how does wind vary with height from some altitude down to the surface?” there’s
no clear answer to that question yet without doing a lot of work.
For the general question, “How does wind vary with height?” there
are formulas, but we still have limited information on applying those
formulas to hurricanes.
My point is that when you ask meteorological
experts to comment on these cases, they have to do research. If they’re
simply plugging in numbers without that research, it’s not
going to work. It would be like asking a forensics lab to analyze
new DNA that they’d never seen before.
Q. Are you, and other
scientists like you, doing work now that will eventually produce
tables that others can use to look up the answer in the future?
A.
Some of my research projects are geared toward answering those questions,
yes. But the results come out slowly. Take storm surge, for example.
Since Katrina there’s been a lot of research to
try and determine why the storm surge was as large as it was. For
one case I worked on I was reading about computer simulations that
had only been developed a few years before.
The number of people in
funding on weather-related research is tiny compared to other sciences.
For a given meteorological problem you might find there are 5-10
people in the world working on it, whereas if you looked at a research
issue in, say, diabetes, you’d find
more than 100 labs working on it. The level of activity is higher in
other fields. In one way, it’s nice—when I publish, I know
it’s not likely someone else will beat me to my research findings.
But it means new understanding is acquired slowly.
IMS Expert Services is the premier expert
witness and litigation consultant search firm in the legal
industry. IMS is focused exclusively on providing custom expert
witness search services. We are proud to be the choice of over
95 of the AmLaw Top 100.
Call us at 877-838-8464.
View All Articles | Newsletter
Signup | Contact Us