Specialized Patent Courts Begin 10 Year Trial

By IMS ExpertServices

From patent reform to increased filings, there have been several major developments in patent law this year, including the creation of a 10-year district court patent pilot program.

Through this program, several federal districts were selected to serve as specialized patent courts in an effort to encourage enhancement of expertise in patent cases among district judges.  Patent cases will continue to be randomly assigned to judges in federal court as usual, however, judges now have the option of declining the case and sending it to one of the specialized patent courts.

According to the Southern District of New York’s Chief Judge, Loretta A. Preska, "This pilot will further refine the court's expertise, and it will ultimately help us better serve patent litigants."

Attorneys, politicians and intellectual property owners have long been asking for specialized patent courts. For example, in 2007, a similar pilot program passed the House of Representatives but died with the 109th Congress.

The appeal of specialized patent courts is in their hypothetical ability to efficiently handle these complicated cases. As District Judge Thomas Griesa points out, "These can be difficult cases to deal with, and of a particular technical nature." Having a court that is well versed in patent law eases the process.

Pursuant to Pub. L. No. 111-349, fourteen district courts were selected for the program in June of this year. They were chosen from among the fifteen district courts that had the largest number of patent cases filed in 2010.

As mentioned in earlier coverage of the patent reform, many patent attorneys expect increased litigation to result from the loose language in the America Invents Act.  One U.S. patent agent believes “the patent community will be at sea for a number of years until the Federal Circuit and Supreme Court definitively interpret loose language.” It is possible that the district courts selected for this pilot program will serve as the first stop in clarifying current patent laws.

The courts selected:

    • Eastern District of New York

 

    • Southern District of New York

 

    • Western District of Pennsylvania

 

    • District of New Jersey

 

    • District of Maryland

 

    • Northern District of Illinois

 

    • Southern District of Florida

 

    • District of Nevada

 

    • Eastern District of Texas

 

    • Northern District of Texas

 

    • Western District of Tennessee

 

    • Central District of California

 

    • Northern District of California

 

    • Southern District of California

 

Tell us: Do you think specialized patent courts are needed? What are the advantages and disadvantages?

Avatar

IMS ExpertServices

IMS ExpertServices delivers consultative trial and expert services for the most influential global firms. Over nearly three decades and through more than 20,000 cases and 1,000 trials, clients have trusted IMS to equip them with the perspective and tools they need to help their clients succeed. With offices in the San Francisco Bay Area, Dallas, Pensacola, and New York, the company provides trial strategy consulting, jury consulting, trial graphics consulting, trial presentation consulting, and expert witness recruitment and management. IMS has earned nine consecutive rankings on the Inc. 5000 list, won recognition by The National Law Journal in six categories of its “Best of 2020” awards, by Corporate Counsel Magazine as winner in eight categories of its “Best of 2019” awards, and as “Go-To Thought Leader” for two consecutive years by The National Law Review. More about IMS ExpertServices can be found at: www.expertservices.com.

Get the best expert

Fill out the form and one of our representatives will be in touch with you shortly. Or, you can call or email us directly.